Select All Content
Presentations
NROC Collection
Non-Majors Biology
Khan Academy Collection
Biology
Dallas Learning Solutions Collection
Nutrition & Digestion
Health & Wellness
Physical Education
STEMbite Collection
Biology in the Real World
NASA Collection
Launchpad—Biology
Real World—Biology
Simulations
PhET Collection
Biology
Dallas Learning Solutions Collection
Nutrition
Search:
Select an item from the left column to display a list of Topics.
(To select multiple items, hold down the command or control key.)
Sequential
Topic Name
hide column
maximize
Teaching Biology Blog

If it bleeds, it leads?

More Blog Posts

I was browsing around the science magazine websites this weekend, admiring this year’s winners of the International Science and Engineering Visualization Challenge. The contest has a lofty purpose, laid out on its homepage at the National Science Foundation

Some of science’s most powerful statements are not made in words. From the diagrams of DaVinci to Rosalind Franklin’s x-rays, visualization of research has a long and literally illustrious history. To illustrate is to enlighten.

How many people would have heard of fractal geometry or the double helix or solar flares if they had been described solely in words? In a world where science literacy is dismayingly rare, illustrations provide the most immediate and influential connection between scientists and other citizens, and the best hope for nurturing popular interest. Indeed, they are now a necessity for public understanding of research developments.

The National Science Foundation (NSF) and Science created the International Science and Engineering Visualization Challenge to celebrate that grand tradition—and to encourage its continued growth. The spirit of the competition is for communicating science, engineering and technology for education and journalistic purposes.
Well now, that’s pretty cool. And so are the images. You can see thumbnails at NSF, and nice big slideshows at National Geographic and msnbc.

I couldn’t help noticing how many of the stories announcing the winners led not with this 1st place photo of diatoms, called ‘The Glass Forest’…
Photo by Mario De Stefano, The Second University of Naples

...but with this honorable mention image of the a squid's fanged suckers, ‘Squid Suckers: The Little Monsters That Feed the Beast.’
Photo by Jessica D. Schiffman and Caroline L. Schauer, Drexel University
What is it about the scary side of science that is so much more appealing? Now that I think about it, I realize I’ve always loaded my earth and biological science courses with earthquakes and volcanoes, plagues and pestilence and things that go bump in the night. It’s an easy hook, but I wonder if it’s the best one. Is repeated reference to the violent and the flashy parts of biological processes simply a way to engage students so they pay some attention to the duller stuff? Or does making biology seem more like the latest video game than part of ordinary life distance them from understanding their real place in the natural world? By emphasizing nature red in tooth and claw, are we teaching science or presenting edutainment?

Links
How to Make a Playlist on HippoCampus:
A four-minute tutorial video
Interactive Frog Dissection:
The Biology Project, developed at The University of Arizona:

HippoCampus and NROC are trademarks of the Monterey Institute for Technology and Education. Copyright 2014 Monterey Institute for Technology and Education. Click here for our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

*AP, Advanced Placement and Advanced Placement Program are registered trademarks of the College Board, which was not involved in the production of, and does not endorse, this content.